About Me

Name: P. Acosta
Location: Miami, FL
Biography
Loading...

Create Your Own Blog Find Other Townhall Blogs

Comments

Archives

Blog Roll

 

Dogma Trumps Reality

Socialism, collectivism, communism, call it whatever you want, just do not call it new, in fact it may very well be the oldest form of government known to man. In recent history, there has not been a shortage of countries that have dabbled with this governmental experiment, leaving sufficient reliable results from which the civilized world can draw upon. Still in spite of its almost universal record of failures, demagogues in full possession of the facts continue to peddle to the masses the socialistic utopia of the proverbial “free lunch”. Knowing full well that by so doing, certain segments of society will always reward them with their votes.

A wise man said that “a method which fails repeatedly may possibly be wrong”, still far too many people do not allow facts to get in the way of their opinions, and treat facts as though they were… an inconvenient truth. In the 20th century, virtually every perverse doctrine that suffocated freedom, slaved the governed and threatened world peace, began as Socialism; this was true of Fascism, Nazism and Communism.  Although the argument can be made that Socialism does not always progress into one of the previously mentioned doctrines, the fact is that Socialism will always (without exception) limit freedom and individuality by forcefully taking away from the population the fruits of their labor, and by imposing itself upon the private sector, this destruction of incentive ultimately produces slough and laziness, thus reducing personal and collective productivity to the detriment of society.

In 1847 Carl Marx wrote “from each according to his ability, to each according to his need” however if Marx would have taken the time to study the American experience, he would have understood the error of his ways. In the early 1620s the pilgrims who were recent arrivals to America, experimented with Socialism, after a year of its implementation Governor William Bradford of Plymouth, Massachusetts wrote, "The experience that was had in this common course and condition, tried sundry years and that amongst godly and sober men, may well evince the vanity of that conceit of Plato's and other ancients applauded by some of later times; that the taking away of property and bringing in community into a commonwealth would make them happy and flourishing; as if they were wiser than God. For this community (so far as it was) was found to breed much confusion and discontent and retard much employment that would have been to their benefit and comfort. For the young men, that were most able and fit for labour and service, did repine that they should spend their time and strength to work for other men's wives and children without any recompense."

As a result of his finding and not having today’s bureaucracy to contend with, the Governor assigned private property rights of land to all members, and gave them the right to profit from their industry. A year after capitalism and the concept of private property had been established, the Governor wrote again. "This had very good success, for it made all hands very industrious, so as much more corn was planted than otherwise would have been by any means the Governor or any other could use, and saved him a great deal of trouble, and gave far better content." In other words… capitalism worked!
 
The idea of demagogues promoting a socialistic agenda, was well understood and repudiated by our forefathers as well, back on 1787 Alexander Hamilton wrote, “A dangerous ambition more often lurks behind the specious mask of zeal for the rights of the people than under the forbidden appearance of zeal for the firmness and efficiency of government. History will teach us that the former has been found a much more certain road to the introduction of despotism than the latter, and that of those men who have overturned the liberties of republics, the greatest number have begun their career by paying an obsequious court to the people; commencing demagogues, and ending tyrants.”

Due to the nature of human behavior, is not difficult to conclude that governments, although a necessary evil, are by nature conducive to corruption, never was the adage of “power corrupts, and absolute power corrupts absolutely” truer, than when applied to the complexities of governing, consequently it stands to reason that the larger the government the more fertile ground there is for corruption.

Of further distress, is the inherent arrogance of the socialist, who believe themselves better equipped to tell the individuals how to manage their lives and how to choose what is in their best interest. On the economic front, their interference with the private sector, and their stated goal to control the nation’s industries, is precisely the type of actions that puts the socialist in a collision course with the essence of the American experiment, as well as with the liberties that our forefathers fought so valiantly to preserve.

All the information available today about Socialism’s shortcomings, would lead one to think that intelligent men and women, regardless of their political persuasion, would understand and agree that Socialism is a tried and failed approach to solving societies necessities, incapable of competing with the free market in generating well being for the same, yet sadly I suspect that the peddlers of Socialism will continue to promote their venomous doctrine of class warfare until the end of times, since the one thing that we seem to always have a great abundance of, is a steady endless stream of demagogues.
 
Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive

The Short Term Mindset

If after a lifetime of laboring and saving we were to raid our nest egg to initiate a lavish spending spree of cars, wines, jewelry, parties and travel; we would indeed experience a false sense of wealth that we may not have experience before, yet could this false sense of abundance be representative of our long term well being?  What happens once our spending spree far exceeds our ability to pay and the “chickens come home to roost”, what then?

The common sense approach to economics that most sensible individuals understand and adhere to in their own lives when it comes to spending their own money, do not apply when a group of politicians are allowed to spend the people’s hard earned money, with little to no accountability. These days, is doesn’t matter whether the politician calls himself a Republican or a Democrat, fiscal responsibility is no longer part of our elected officials DNA.

The constant pounding of the left wing media, the unabashed demagoguery of politicians, and the general public’s apathy and unwillingness to educate themselves beyond the headlines being fed to them daily, has tilted the balance towards the left in our country. This is why there is a large group of politicians in Washington today, who in typical liberal elitist arrogance believe that they are able to control the largest economy in the world from the their high and mighty pedestals of Capitol Hill, ignoring that only the freedom of the marketplace can help the economy rid itself of poor business practices, while promoting productive investments that lead to long-term prosperity and well paying meaningful employment.

As if the rampant spending of the Bush years has not been enough, the situation looks even bleaker when we consider the makeup of the current political landscape; all indications are that the spending will increase, which probably means that our economic situation will continue to get worse before it gets better. Even if the large amounts of bailout monies were to generate the false sense of abundance that the government is seeking in the short term, the repercussions of keeping sunken companies artificially afloat will have devastating consequences in the long run.

 One does not need to be an economist to understand the simple concept of supply and demand, which establishes that the greater the abundance of any item, the less valuable it becomes. The unfettered printing of dollars being dumped into our economy with little accountability will make the dollar even less valuable, causing inflationary pressures that will hurt the elderly and the poor on fixed incomes the most. We are already hearing rumblings about the devaluation of the dollar, something that will be an even greater blow to millions of Americans who have already seen their retirement accounts depleted due to the rapid decline of their investments, and the instability of the financial markets.

Still we continue to make “economic” decisions that have more to do with politics than with the economy. We are told that we are bailing out the automobile companies, when in reality it is the unions that we are bailing out. If we were interested on the long term survival of the industry, we would insist on their reorganizations, so that they can rid themselves of bad debt and obligations, allowing them to emerge stronger and able to compete. But politics as well as the lack of faith on the free market, leads our politicians to throw billions of tax payer’s dollars to a business plan that no private investor would spend a single penny on. 

It has indeed been a year of ironies; we have placed in charge of resolving the financial crisis, the same politicians that caused the crisis, by forcing financial institutions to play Russian roulette with our monies, and we are rewarding with billions of dollars our most poorly run and dishonest industries, regardless of their incompetent or reprehensible behavior.

Email ItEmail It | Print ItPrint It | CommentsComments (0) | TrackbacksTrackbacks (0) | Flag as offensiveFlag as Offensive
« Previous1Next »